search

 Instructional Design, Transfer of Training & Program Evaluation

0 comments

file time: 2008-02-16

filetype:ppt

Click Here To Download...

>  
 
 
 
 

Instructional Design, Transfer of Training  
& Program Evaluation 

 
Barbara A. Bichelmeyer, Ph.D

Associate Professor

Department of Instructional Systems Technology

Indiana University 

Middle East Technical University

Ankara, Turkey

21 June 2005

 
 
 
 
 

A sampling of my time in Turkey 

Dolmabahce Palace Taksim Square Galata Tower Bogazici University tour Basilica Cisterns Haghia Sophia Blue Mosque Topkapi Palace Grand Bazaar & Spice Bazaar Whirling Dervishes First National Assembly Anatolian Civilization Museum Old Castle view METU tour  
 
 
 
 

What I have learned so far00/font> 

Turkey is 6,500 years old Crossroad of East and West 36 sultans during the Ottoman Empire Attaturk revolutionized everything Turkey has changed constantly to survive and grow Technology is changing everything here and everywhere People from different countries are  
more alike than they are different Just like countries, people must change 
in order to survive and grow  
 
 
 
 

My Assumptions About You 

A wide-range of experiences as educators Working in educational institutions Expertise in IDT and related disciplines of education Various levels of academic experience You could be giving a lecture to me00/font>  
 
 
 
 

What Experience Do I Have to Offer? 

20 years experience: 
- Teacher 
- Instructional designer 
- Performance consultant 
- Professor 
- Evaluator  
Work Settings: 
- Secondary school 
- Higher Education  
- Corporate 
- Government 
- Military 
- Non-profit 
- Health Care  
 
 
 
 

What Can I Possibly Tell You? 

Technology has changed the world so that the amount of information is now so great that people can never again 00now all that is known00/font> People must develop skills that facilitate intentional change and intentional learning Educators must teach not only their topic,  
they must also teach students how to learn Educators need to know about how people 
experience the processes of change and growth  
 
 
 
 

Purpose of this Session 

Identify basic assumptions behind initiatives for human change and transfer of learning, Identify transfer as the goal of instruction, Describe elements that impact transfer of learning, Explore relationship between instruction and change initiatives, Explain implications for instruction/program evaluation, Provide IDT professionals with a more complete skill set for conducting and evaluating instructional and change initiatives.  
 
 
 
 

Influences 
(IC, S/K, M/I, E) 

Organization 
Goals 
 

Accomplish- 
ments 
 
 

Actions 
 

Influences = Programmatic support for organization initiatives

Actions = Activities that leads to accomplishments

Accomplishments = What individuals produce to support org goals

Organization Goals = The value-added of the organization 
 

Assumption #1: 
Basic Progression of Human Performance

 
 
 
 
 

Assumption #2: 
The Performance Equation 

P = IC * M/I * S/K * * Env 

Inherent Capability = individuals00 inherent abilities and dispositions

Skills/Knowledge = facilitate individuals00knowledge of what/how to do

Motivation/Incentive = support individuals00desires to do

Environmental supports = provide individuals with resources to do

 
 
 
 
 

Assumption #3: 
Basic Progression of Instructional Design 

Influences 
(IC, S/K, M/I, E) 

Organization 
Goals 
 

Accomplish- 
ments 
 
 

Actions 
 

Systematic instructional design involves reverse engineering 
(beginning with the end in mind): 

1. What is the Goal we are trying to achieve?

2. What accomplishments must be produced in order to achieve the goal?

3. What behaviors must performers engage in?

4. What influences are required to support performers (IC, S/K, M/I, Env)?

 
 
 
 
 
Instruction is an appropriate intervention if (and only if) a Skill / Knowledge deficit is present in performers The purpose of instruction is to increase overt and covert capability in learners so they can do things they were never before able to do (as opposed to information, the purpose of which is to reduce uncertainty) The goal is instruction is to ensure that performers00new capabilities transfer to the 00eal world00/font>  
 

Goal and Purpose of Instruction

 
 
 
 
 

Why does transfer of learning matter? 

Influences 
(S/K, M/I, E) 

Business 
Goals 
 

Accomplish- 
ments 
 
 

Actions 
 

We are interested in transfer of learning because:

- it impacts human performance

- it impacts effectiveness of organizations

 
 
 
 
 

1) Transfer to long-term memory

2) Transfer to 00eal world00performance 

Can00 have #2 if you don00 have #1 This is why pre-test and post-test are so important  

Two Types of Learning Transfer

 
 
 
 
 

Impact of Instructional Design on Transfer 

Elements that systematically produce transfer of learning:

Goals - what do you want to transfer? Performance Aids - tools that support transfer Tests - how you will measure transfer Application & Feedback - how you will facilitate transfer Examples - how you will model for transfer Instruction - how you will prepare learner for transfer Leader material - how to set up instruction that transfers  
 
 
 
 

 
 
Impact of Application on Transfer 
 

Transfer to LTM =  
Quantity of opportunities for application 
Transfer to 00eal World00 =  
Quality of opportunities for application  
 
 
 
 

Major Blocks to Transfer 

Lack of consideration of Performance Equation Instruction that is not designed systematically Not enough opportunities for application and feedback Low levels of simulation in application Minimal variance of problems in application Forgetting (time between learning and performance) Lack of E and M/I support in real world  
 
 
 
 

Systemic Support for Transfer 

Back to Performance equation: 
IC + S/K + Env + M/I Plan and Follow up: 
Before - During - After  
Lack of systematic support minimizes possibility of transfer Instructional designers and program managers must work together for integrated support  
 
 
 
 

Kirkpatrick & Evaluation of Training 

Level 4: Long-Term Results / ROI  
Level 3: OTJ Behavior  
Level 2: Participant Learning 
Level 1: Participant Reaction  
 
 
 
 

Kirkpatrick00 4 Levels of Evaluation 

A sequence of ways to evaluate instructional programs  
Each level is important 
None of the levels should be bypassed to get to a level that is considered more important  
As you move from one level to the next, the process becomes more difficult and time-consuming 
Each level provides more valuable information  
 
 
 
 

Links between Program Design,  
Instruction & Program Evaluation 

Business Goal 

Influences 

Behaviors 

Accomplishments 

Results / ROI 

Reaction 

Learning 

Real World Behavior 

Program Design: 

Program

Evaluation: 

Instruction

 
 
 
 
 

Where Does Transfer Begin? 

Level 4: Long-Term Results / ROI Level 3: Real World Behavior Level 2: Participant Learning Level 1: Participant Reaction

(Kirkpatrick00 four levels of training evaluation)

 
 
 
 
 

What To Know about Instruction 

1) Purpose of instruction is to increase human capability that helps to achieve goals of program/organization

2) Instruction is but one influence on human performance

3) Instruction is an investment in human capital 00 
most expensive investment

4) Instruction is only valuable if it transfers to performance context

5) Transfer is dependent on well-designed instruction

6) Transfer requires performance supports after instruction

7) Instructional staff must work with program management to provide appropriate supports for transfer

8) Evaluators should study relationship between instruction and program management

 
 
 
 
 

Implications for Evaluation 

The better the instructional design, the easier it is to do instructional evaluation and program evaluation  
Success of instruction is measured in Level 2 
Instruction can never take complete credit for 00eal world00performance or ROI 
This doesn00 mean that we can not evaluate whether our goals have been achieved  
 
 
 
 

Seminal Sources 

Joseph H. Harless (1993), An Ounce of Analysis 
Donald L. Kirkpatrick (1994), Evaluating Training Programs 
Robert Mager (1997), The New Mager Six-Pack 
Thomas Gilbert (1968), Human Competence  
 
 
 
 

Contact Information 

Barbara A. Bichelmeyer, Ph.D.

Associate Professor

Department of Instructional Systems Technology

Indiana University

201 North Rose Ave., #2226

Bloomington, IN 47405-1006

812-856-8468

   download Instructional Design, Transfer of Training & Program Evaluation

Responses to Instructional Design, Transfer of Training & Program Evaluation

It's no comment...

 

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Talk: